Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sandy Hook shooting
09-04-2017, 05:42 PM
Post: #241
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
“PROVE tone that your conspiracy theory is true.”

This is not about you underminer, it’s about others who read these postings and take away some information to consider.

As far as YOU are concerned, you continue to avoid telling us what you believe is the accepted explanation for the question: By whom, how, and when, were the 20 children pronounced dead.

We understand that you choose not to address the question. That makes what you believe irrelevant.

Why you believe….the information and processing used which allows us to agree or disagree….is of interest. If you don’t wish to participate, that makes you irrelevant.

Anyway ….regarding the absence of verification of death of the 20 Sandy Hook students by trained professional medical personnel; we also have the issue of the parental notification process by the ‘officials’.

How the hell did the officials find out/identify which of the 500 + students inside the school were shot and killed….. so they could locate and notify the parents?

Well, they waited until nightfall to do the ‘autopsies’, I got that. How were the parents of the 20 kids that were allegedly shot and killed identified, located, and notified?

According to Medical Examiner Carver:

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/05/26/...rate-hoax/

"Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—"

“Compounding the situation, the parents were not even allowed to view their children’s bodies to identify them. Instead, they were reportedly shown photographs of the deceased. This was done, according to the Medical Examiner, Wayne Carver, in order to “control the situation.” But what was there about the situation that required “control”? No parent of our acquaintance would have agreed to accept the death of a child without viewing the body. James Tracy has published a discussion of the medical examiner’s performance.”

Can you believe it?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-05-2017, 08:25 AM
Post: #242
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
Some other things that were very very strange.

Blood handling........Blood is a biohazard wherever it is found spilled or otherwise. Have you ever noticed in you doctor's office that little wastebasket with the "biohazard"sign on it that anything that contacts blood is tossed into?

......."There are Federal and State Laws and Regulations regarding transportation of some biohazards. The provider must have hazmat certification in order to handle such materials that may be incinerated and transported. There are a wide range of biohazard waste that include but not limited to liquids, solids and aerosols. The Environmental Protection Agency, Dept of Transportation, OSHA, and all the states, have rules and regulations regarding the handling of blood!

Removing blood from a crime scene is extremely serious business that must be done by trained personnel and handled and disposed of as prescribed by law.

OSHA regulations on blood, body fluids and infectious waste

I have seen NOTHING of how this crime scene was "cleaned up". Legally speaking that building could not have been worked on or demolished, until the site was clean of the biohazard.

Where is the info on how this cleanup was done.....and who did it?

You can tell this scam was pulled off by "leftists" as leftists are basically stupid, believing in their fairy tales of Utopia ect. So many things were left out of faking the scenario that it is easy for any lay person, with a reasonable mind and capacity to think about things, to see all the glaring holes in the fake story!

And devout little "hesheits" all over the country suck the lies right up....and believe it all....as they are just as stupid as the government leftists who pulled this charade off!

WC
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-06-2017, 09:45 AM
Post: #243
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
Blood?

http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/06/22/no-...r-is-back/

No blood.

In a conference call of Sandy Hook researchers earlier this month, one individual explains her unanswered queries to the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and Lieutenant J. Paul Vance concerning what parties were responsible for cleaning up the gruesome crime scene at the Sandy Hook school last December. DEEP deferred to the State Police. “What blood?” Vance responded, before deferring to yet another state agency.

Note: the audio in the link will not play for some reason. I do remember playing it shortly after it came out in 2013.

http://insanemedia.net/sandy-hook-eviden...blood/4557

Sandy Hook Evidence:Where is the Blood?

Note: this site does a thorough evaluation of why the video presentations of SH do not show "blood".

Caller relating her conversation with Lt. Vance:
Who did the blood clean-up at Sandy Hook? And he was totally caught off guard. At first he said, “what blood?”

“26 people died in that building, who cleaned up the blood, Sir?”

“Uhh, I don’t know…You’ll have to call the violent crimes unit.”

Unfortunately the caller didn’t have the means to record her conversation with Lt. Vance so we have only her word as to it’s accuracy. Although, given the apparent cleanliness of the area outside the school, I may have also asked, “what blood?”
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 04:51 AM
Post: #244
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
It's sad that these parents grieve once the loss of their child, but then have to "prove" that they lost their child to a bunch of mentally ill nobodies who swear they're experts on blood splatter, crime scenes and internal government operations because they read blogs maintained by jobless losers, view videos by wannabes and listen to alternative radio broadcasts hosted by under-achievers ever-bent on convincing the weak-minded of their importance. Ugh.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 07:29 AM
Post: #245
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
"Cleanup to aisle 9......for "hesheit" vomit!"
WC
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 06:00 PM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2017 06:13 PM by spider.)
Post: #246
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
(09-07-2017 04:51 AM)Underminer Wrote:  It's sad that these parents grieve once the loss of their child, but then have to "prove" that they lost their child to a bunch of mentally ill nobodies who swear they're experts on blood splatter, crime scenes and internal government operations because they read blogs maintained by jobless losers, view videos by wannabes and listen to alternative radio broadcasts hosted by under-achievers ever-bent on convincing the weak-minded of their importance. Ugh.

Just answer the question underminer:
Support your conclusion that 20 kids and 6 adults were shot to death inside that school.

Tell who (and when) you believe the 20 kids were declared dead, ie no vital signs.

“It's sad that these parents grieve….”

Parents grieve?

1. Poster boy crises actor Robbie Parker comes through the door with a shit-eating grin…somebody says “ok roll the scenario”.
Scenario? What scenario? The parent grieving ‘scenario’?

He deep breathes and then goes into character….grieving. Not effective at all.

2. Hide the grin! Hide the grin! The camera is on you.

3. The head back toothy grin at exactly 17 seconds needs to be captured by a techie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKWgCRBR5qE
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 06:22 PM
Post: #247
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
I take it back. It's even sadder that nutcases like you are allowed to walk among the rest of us in a free society.

"Crises actor." Gee, was one of them Kermit Roosevelt?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2017, 06:36 AM
Post: #248
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/18/to...mcdonnell/

And in the link above we get to watch that ghoul Anderson Cooper refusing to let the McDonnells rest in piece.

Don’t they look like a Happy couple?......that just had their daughter shot multiple times in a ‘school shooting’. If you can freeze frame at 00:54 when they first come on screen…they are laughing uproariously. WTF?

So at 6:55 the grieving mom explains that when they walked in the room at the funeral home with the white casket….it was the ‘first time they could be with their daughter’?

Anderson Cooper asks at 8:45…”it must have been hard not to actually see her.” What then rolls out to about 9:26 is a mother explaining why they decided not to even observe the body.
Incredible

Do I understand their 7 year old daughter was shot to death and they never saw the body? How did they know what was in the casket?

Can you believe it?

Simply not credible. Crises actors.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2017, 06:44 AM
Post: #249
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
The LEFT believe lies......because their entire ideology is built upon them.

Goobermint says it happened.....MEDIA says it happened therefore it did, no "independent analysis" is ever required. No brain is ever needed to discern TRUTH as these wonderful folks would NEVER lie...huh?

What ignorant fools! Spider, you are wasting time trying to use logic with an idiot!

WC
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2017, 07:08 AM (This post was last modified: 09-08-2017 07:16 AM by John Smith.)
Post: #250
RE: Sandy Hook shooting
(09-08-2017 06:44 AM)woodcanoe Wrote:  The LEFT believe lies......because their entire ideology is built upon them.

Goobermint says it happened.....MEDIA says it happened therefore it did, no "independent analysis" is ever required. No brain is ever needed to discern TRUTH as these wonderful folks would NEVER lie...huh?

What ignorant fools! Spider, you are wasting time trying to use logic with an idiot!

WC

People "believe" what they want to believe and it helps if it fits well with their views. When people are shown facts that don't fit their views they feel disbelief in the facts. Once they disbelieve, they can rarely change their mind. No one wants to believe that their government would act to deceive them and many automatically disbelieve any claims to the contrary. It's how they keep their sanity. Imagine what would happen if a majority began to distrust their government. It's mind boggling, I can't conceive it and refuse to believe it.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | My Site | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication